Warren Buffett is an
investing icon, and when he speaks, investors pay attention. Buffett is well-known for not only his strengths as a
businessman, but also for his rather outspoken dislike of gold. The stance is
somewhat controversial given the massive popularity of the precious metal especially
in India.
In
1998, he said - "Gold gets dug out of the ground in Africa, or
someplace. Then we melt it down, dig another hole, bury it again and pay people
to stand around guarding it. It has no utility. Anyone watching from Mars would
be scratching their head."
He echoed these thoughts in a CNBC interview. He was
asked, “Where do you think gold will be in five years and should that be a part
of value investing?”
“I have no views as to where it will be, but the one thing I can tell you
is it won’t do anything between now and then except look at you. Whereas,
you know, Coca-Cola will be making money, and I think Wells Fargo will be
making a lot of money and there will be a lot — and it’s a lot — it’s a lot
better to have a goose that keeps laying eggs than a goose that just sits there
and eats insurance and storage and a few things like that.”
In October 2010, Warren Buffett said:
“You could take all the gold that’s ever been mined, and it would fill a
cube 67 feet in each direction. For what that’s worth at current gold prices,
you could buy all — not some — all of the farmland in the United States.
Plus, you could buy 10 Exxon Mobils, plus have $1 trillion of walking-around
money. Or you could have a big cube of metal. Which would you take? Which is
going to produce more value?”
“Gold is a way of going long on fear, and it has been a
pretty good way of going long on fear from time to time. But you really have to
hope people become more afraid in a year or two years than they are now. And if
they become more afraid you make money, if they become less afraid you lose
money, but the gold itself doesn’t produce anything."
He says, “if you own one ounce of gold for an eternity, you will
still own one ounce at its end”
So, what do Indians think of gold?
Mr. S Gurumurthy, a commentator
on political and economic affairs and a corporate advisor, in a brilliant article in Oct 2013
has nicely brought out the importance of gold for Indians who do not just
go by the price trend and return on investment. He says that gold has
consistently beaten inflation in India, been a family security to most Indians
and a marketable security. He writes:
Modern economists and the Indian people seem to operate on
two different paradigms with regard to gold. In the modern West, gold is more a
state asset than a private possession. Gold constitutes just three per cent of
family wealth there, but a third in India. Western states, socialist or
capitalist, expropriated all private gold during the last century. Even the
liberal US outlawed private gold in 1936 and built official gold reserve of
over 20,000 tonnes by 1950.
Modern economics views
gold as an uneconomic, wasteful, private investment. But traditionally, in
India, gold has been the preferred asset of the rural masses who hold 70 per
cent of the nation’s stocks. Indian gold habits clearly mock at modern economic
theories.
Market Oracle, a
UK-based market analysis and forecasting online publication, captures the
relation between India and gold thus: Indians own 20,000 tonnes of gold worth
$1 trillion — almost half of India's GDP. For Indians, gold is not just money
or asset; it ensures the financial security and stability of families. It has
religious overtones. More than a commodity or money, it is integral to the warp
and weft of family life. Investments in gold and jewellery are
indistinguishable. Jewellery is the working capital of families; families
collateralise it for commercial borrowing.
Some 13 per cent of Indian families, more
from rural areas, borrow against gold as collateral; while rural India borrows
from the unorganised financial sector, urbanites access bank loans.
Undervalued private
financial institutions and the discredited moneylenders are the main sources of
finance for the largest employment provider of the country. And the collateral
for their loans is invariably gold.
There is no collateral,
stocks or real estate, as liquid as gold in India. How can gold, so valuable a
security for productive credit, be dismissed in India as a “barbaric relic”?
However,
whatever Warren Buffett’s reasons may be, it’s hard to argue against gold’s
importance to Indians.
The below
chart gives the performance of gold since 1980.
Source: WGC
CAGR - Jan 1980 till date
|
2.69%
|
Hardly any returns over 35 years
|
||
CAGR - 1.1.1980 till 30.12.05
|
0.00%
|
|||
CAGR - 1.1.2005 till date
|
11.86%
|
Huge run up from Aug 2005 to 2011
|
||
CAGR - Jan 2005 to Sep 2011
|
24.64%
|
|||
CAGR - Sep 2011 till date
|
-10.97%
|
Negative returns from end 2011- a
retreat from the highs of 2011
|
It’s hard
to tell what the future holds for gold prices. The billionaire investor hasn’t
changed his tune on gold, and it’s hard to believe that he will change
course anytime soon. Indians dont just love gold.
They revere it. Their reverence for gold manifests itself during Danteras and Akshaya
Tritiya — the auspicious days for buying gold. The number of
lady students in my workshops who will continue to go for gold schemes of
jewelers is only proof of the value of gold as a security.
Financial planners always speak of asset allocation and even though
prices have fallen from the highs as seen in the above graph, many advisers ask
us to maintain an allocation to gold.
So what do you think? Is
Buffett simply stuck in his ways, or is he right about gold?
No comments:
Post a Comment